Difference between revisions of "Wishlist"
From Responsible Data Wiki
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| Blame perpetuates sexual violence | | Blame perpetuates sexual violence | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | Exchange standards for NGOs | + | | Exchange standards for NGOs |
| Easier to collaborate, compare, track, evaluate | | Easier to collaborate, compare, track, evaluate | ||
|- | |- | ||
Latest revision as of 16:55, 14 October 2014
| What? | Why? |
|---|---|
| Goverment interaction | Contextual understanding and more collaboration. Better understanding on both parts |
| Legal advice, especially on local context and nuances | Know what we are bound by in different contexts |
| Protocols for internet of things (IoT) (citizen science) data | Roll-out of IoT/GIS/citizen scient means we have a wealth of sensitive data genearated that is also good for science and research, but guidelines are needed for securing privacy and transparency |
| Guide for digital security in the Middle East that is updated regularly | To stay safe with less research |
| Reponsible Data toolkits for "X" | Starting point for those who need |
| More convicting, fining and issuing of sanctions to spying and surveilling companies and governments | To raise the cost and make it more difficult |
| Global campaign to tackle blame (I Never Ask for It - when and how has sexual violence been justified?) [work in progress - campaign] | Blame perpetuates sexual violence |
| Exchange standards for NGOs | Easier to collaborate, compare, track, evaluate |
| Engaging donors to fund responsible data practice within projects/programmes they fund | If donors want impact data, they should put up that to ensure it can be collected, hosted, shared etc in a responsible way |
| List of benefits and harm potential of different types of data | Because if we knee-jerk and close down access to data too fast, we may never know what good can come of it |
| Local language tools, manuals and information (up-to-date) | |
| Clear guides | Easy to lose the purpose |
