Difference between revisions of "Feeding empirical data into policy making"
(→Outputs) |
(→Outputs) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
'''Group plan''' | '''Group plan''' | ||
| − | Plan/output for this group: | + | Plan/output for this group:<br /> |
1. Non-white inclusive paper on evidence based policy making and responsible data ethics (for publication?)<br /> | 1. Non-white inclusive paper on evidence based policy making and responsible data ethics (for publication?)<br /> | ||
2. Shorter briefs / dissemination material in different forms <br /> | 2. Shorter briefs / dissemination material in different forms <br /> | ||
Revision as of 14:16, 1 October 2014
Subtitle: one sentence on what it does, who is it for, and what is its goal
Contents
Outputs
Minimum viable product
List of moments in policy process in which we can engage
Aspirational output
List different strategies to engage
Stretch goals
Produce a case study, best practice
Group plan
Plan/output for this group:
1. Non-white inclusive paper on evidence based policy making and responsible data ethics (for publication?)
2. Shorter briefs / dissemination material in different forms
3. Using, where possible, resources from the work churned out by other groups here on harm stories, success/failure documentation, etc.
Connection to previous RDFs
Add links, any useful information
Notes
Free text
Audience
Personas, use cases, context
Next steps
Contributors
Food for thought
- concepts, problems
- questions to ask frequently
- preventions: what do you actually do in concrete terms to prevent these things from happening
- reactions: responsible responses for when things go wrong
Resources (we <3 links!)
Feel free to link any and all background material, additional info, useful resources, etc. The more the merrier!
