RDF Manila Human Rights Documentation
From Responsible Data Wiki
To whom are we responsible?
- Individuals that are the focus of documentation
- People who give you info
- People the info is about
- People who it is for
- People you communicate the info to/people who are listening/ppl who use/reuse your data
- Beneficiaries
- To all humans affected by human rights
- Your documentation team (and yourself)
- Any community indirectly affected by the data
- Those who are represented (directly or indirectly) by the data/info
- Donors and funding bodies
- Peers
What are we responsible for?
- Be honest about if you are the right org to be collecting data
- Using appropriate resources for documentation
- Mitigating adversarial use of data
- Thorough/imaginative risk assessments/mitigation stratgies/plans
- Analysis is correct/defensible; no misrepresentation
- Cultural/political sensitivities are carefully managed in collection/use
- Controlled/planned end to project and/or follow through in a sustainable way
- Clear objectives/goals
- Positively influence guidelines to good practice
- Credibility of over data/info
- Risk/impact of the work
- Verifiability of data (integrity)
- How/if/when to publish/share
- Credibility/integrity/transparency of methods/process
- Actually using it (not just collecting it) to create positive change
- Attempt to foresee future risks as times change
- Representations of data
- Protecting personal identifiable data in the broadest sense
- Simple/straightforward
- Data connects to advocacy mechanisms that are available
- Monitoring/informing data reuse
- Follow through particularly if the case is about an individual
- Rights-based approach to data use/collection
- Bring it back to the community you collected it/for
How are we held responsible?
- Legally/contractually
- Trust/relationship w/ communities and process of bringing data back to the community
- Legislative/policy frameworks
- Peers/agreements about good practice
- Donors/funders
- Internal guidelines/standards
- Adversaries (human rights violators)
- Conscience
- Media
- Boards/steering committees
- Institutional memory/culture
- Institutional review boards (IRBs at universities)
- Ethical framework
- Data audits/peer review/ external & transpareny reviews